The WHO’s IARC working group failed to be objective or critical and presented weak evidence against red meat to a world that is in desperate need of proper nourishment. Image Credit: The National Cancer Institute.

Why is the World Health Organisation Anti-Meat?

A look at the laughable evidence used by the IARC to wrongfully condemn red meat.

The soft leather seats and bustle of the coffee shop belied the importance of the meeting. It was going well so far, skipping along with nods and positive noises, and then everything changed. Upon hearing some of my recommendations, the healthcare consultant, with eyes wide, hugged his knee like a life raft and recoiled at the back of his seat. He recovered, leant in towards me and, locking his eyes to mine, said with absolute finality,

‘Tim, the World Health Organisation, has classified red meat as a carcinogen.’

In 2015, the World Health Organisation (WHO), published a report produced by their International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). It was notable because of its classification of red and processed meats. Publishing a summary in the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, they stated:

‘After thoroughly reviewing the accumulated scientific literature, a Working Group of 22 experts from 10 countries convened by the IARC Monographs Programme classified the consumption of red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), based on limited evidence that the consumption of red meat causes cancer in humans and strong mechanistic evidence…